Turning Point, Loss to America
Since September 10, 2025, the big news inside the United States has been the Charlie Kirk assassination. The 31-year old parent and right-wing media star founder of Turning Point USA was assassinated at a college speaking tour stop at Utah Valley University (UVU) before a huge live audience including live-streaming. The tragedy occurred during the Q&A, while taking questions about mass shootings and transgenderism.
The irony could not be missed, but the panic caused the crowd to quickly disperse, with the campus being vacated in just a few hours, while police and search teams scoured the area looking for clues, trying to track down the assassin(s). Because the next day was September 11th, the UVU president issued an order for campus shutdown till September 15th.
Within 24 hours, the police had arrested several suspects, including a George Zinn (who happened to also be present during the September 11th World Trade Center, and Boston Marathon attacks), and eventually a 22-year old college student named Tyler Robinson. However these arrests are for questioning because there are many questions that remain, such as who else may be involved, and whether there are multiple shooters. As Redacted News pointed out, there is now a tendency for even the police to function via Occam’s Razor, to find someone, anyone culpable, to quickly pin the blame and prove to the public some “results.” As Emilio2763 on Twitter pointed out, however, there is recording evidence of a private plane N888KG with its radar illegally turned off flying away within half an hour from the airport, which is less than 15 minutes away.
Actually enough video has been shared, particularly by Stew Peters Network, “Shots Fired” show, that shows it was one single clear shot. At least one attendee has commented, and it did appear so from the sound, that the shot was from close-up, not hundreds of yards away from a roof-top sniper. It is this debate that has filled the space of news commentators online. Could the Mauser type shot gun with a scope actually do the job, and can it be mounted and dismantled repeatedly in such a short time?
Not according to Mauser gun owners including The Health Ranger (Brighteon), and Jim Stone (Voterig.com). Podcasters have also jumped at the mainstream media enlarging upon personal details, including that Tyler Robinson was involved in a relationship with a transgender boyfriend. They had been friends for years as gamers, but their relationship had become rocky. Could this be the basis for Tyler Robinson tasking himself with a “heroic feat” to “prove he had come of age” for his boyfriend? This rings too much of an Occam’s Razor type of convenient, simplistic logic used to redirect the masses.
Other podcasters have jumped on the idea that like other mysterious partially solved high-profile assassinations, Mossad-mafia-deepstate may be involved. Was Robinson just a patsy, while the real motive is because Mossad wants to send a “warning message” that this is what happens when politicians and “hasbara” promoters become “woke”? How difficult is it in the age of AI or silicone masks, to fake a video or don a mask to achieve an alibi? In fact, Prime Minister Netanyahu was the earliest foreign dignatory to send a Tweet after the report, expressing how he regretted that Mr. Kirk had turned down an opportunity to meet with him in Israel two weeks ago.
Even the Body Language Guy, Jesus Enrique Rosas, did a recent podcast, “Israel, Netanyahu and the CONSPIRACY to kill Charlie Kirk,” demonstrating that Charlie had wandered beyond the borders of the plantation: He questioned how Israel, “the whole country being IDF,” one heavily surveilled nation, could possibly have missed October 7th? Wasn’t it more likely they were told to stand down? Charlie also recently asked Ben Shapiro unsettling questions in an interview that caused Shapiro to pause and raise his eyebrows. But Kirk’s independent comments even included the significant funding by secular Jewish donors who have a Marxist agenda, and that this “beast” needed to be rooted out.
Podcaster James Li comments on how Charlie Kirk himself last month confided to a friend, “Hey, if I go against Israel, I think they will kill me.” Certainly it appeared that on the Megyn Kelly Show last month, both appeared to be stepping across the line, but looked rather uncomfortable about it, while basically asserting that America is who matters most, not Israel. If you have to look behind your back as you say “America’s interests come first, not Israel’s,” it makes one wonder who is the sock-puppet?
According to The Last American Vagabond, Charlie Kirk’s last major interview with pro-Israeli podcaster Ben Shapiro may have been too probing. He even used the “G-word” and “Ethnic Cleansing” even hinting that Ben Shapiro was pulling Hasbara, when Charlie’s function should have been to cheer for Israeli interests as “P.R. sock-puppet.” From Charlie Kirk “Israel Bombs Qatar: Ben Shapiro Joins The Charlie Kirk Show” posted on September 9, 2025:
Charlie: “I think you can have disagreements on Israel and still be MAGA.”
Ben: “Obviously you should be America First, but if you’re pro-Hamas, you’re something darker and we shouldn’t put up with that.”
This wouldn’t be the first time the Israelis have sent ominous warnings to national leaders via high-profile murders, according to Jake Tran in “How Israel Assassinates People.” But The Gaggle with Peter and George seemingly disagree at first. Their first discussion about Mr. Kirk, they even reduced him to merely a “GOP sheepherder” who is “this generation’s Newt Gingrich.” Having lived in Russia for so long, have they a diminished sense for the divisive issues America faces today? Charlie was less the “divisive figure” that CNN or MSNBC claims he is, rather, he was this generation’s new clean-cut Ron Howard for a Moral Majority movement among the young. During the second discussion, The Gaggle did point out ironically that if Israel eliminates all the Hamas leaders, there will be NO chance for peace negotiations.
Because of Charlie Kirk’s rising fame as a highly influential social conservative, having the ear of Donald Trump Jr, and access to the news media, undoubtedly he was expected to tow the line. With such a following, he was being groomed to become a world-class politician. But that would have included no discussions about Jeffrey Epstein being a Mossad agent, behaving very pro-Zionist Israel and pro-Netanyahu, never expressing any doubt whatsoever about Israel among personal friends. This was why Charlie was becoming “the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-flowing fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu” according to sources.
However yet another motive for the murder also exists that neither The Gaggle nor Liberty Vault—much less any mainstream news—actually will explore: the racial angle. Just days before the murder, Charlie Kirk and Van Jones were debating the fatal stabbing by Decarlos Brown Jr of Iryna Zarutska on a light rail train in Charlotte, N.C. The CNN panel objected to Kirk making it a “race issue” and “bringing up race” and Van Jones all but concluded that it is because Charlie Kirk himself is a racist.
The blame-the-victim and ad-hominem logical fallacies are being used to distract from exploring the possibilities, as evident from various hate-mongering extremist social media. Mr. Kirk pointed out what is on public record, that Decarlos Brown himself is heard, while holding the bloody pocket knife, repeatedly saying, “I got that White girl! I got that White girl!” So evidently, while Decarlos had taken pride in his white racial attack, the black community largely still wanted to defend Decarlos as a man deprived of adequate social service support, as someone who just lacked housing and counseling and medications. The lack of public safety was also downplayed.
This is according to initial statements by the Mayor of Charlotte, N.C., the “more social service are needed” argument, and other bleeding-heart liberals. They could not even come out and admit that what was done was evil, that it was an evil thing to do, and the murderer had committed an evil violent uncalled for crime. It is why the new Moral Majority, this nation’s youth, are flocking to the Christian Conferences, such as Turning Point USA sponsored. They are tired of white-guilt trips, of being called out as possible descendants of slave-owners, as having to pay for all kinds of accommodations and reparations to people who use their positions to, as the former LA Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) did, fire good workers and replace them with underqualified friends but rewarded with large salaries and do-nothing type contracts.
It also did not help that Charlie Kirk commented on his recent trip to Japan and South Korea about the very low incidence of violent crime, that there is no chronic fear for one’s safety in any public setting or taking public transportation. In “The Brutal Story Every Fake News Outlet Continues to Ignore,” Charlie stated a couple times:
“And I’m coming back from two nations, Japan and South Korea, that are poorer than us, that are not as populous as U.S., and their cities are not just safer. They are different planetary realities. As if I went to Saturn and we live on Mars. We do not have to live this way. You can create a society and a culture where you can get on a train or a subway and not be Iryna Zarutska and get stabbed to death in the neck because some black criminal decides I’m just going to go do it.”
As various experts have pointed out, the black on white or Other crime is at least five-fold compared to white on black crime. If whites or Others murder a black person it is all over the news, whereas if a group of black teens or other blacks beat up or murder Asians, there is no mention about race, and one has to dig around to find out which races are involved. It has become the case that if no race is mentioned in a violent crime, it is almost certain that the media is covering up for a black person.
Thus, could a psychopathic-version of Van Jones have actually taken Charlie Kirk out due to his daring to air truthful facts about the double-standards present in even media coverage about black on white/Other crimes? Were they so jealous over Charlie Kirk’s sensational rise as a media star that they fostered such hateful resentment?
When a media phenomenon such as Charlie Kirk happens, the first time in decades that someone who appears to represent the way America used to be emerges, someone who at least openly proclaims the value of family, the need for a decent education emphasizing the basics first and foremost, the need to put all of America back to work again, the need to clean up the corroded marketplace of the entertainment occultism, and help end violence in all its forms, that is when the deep-state evil forces take action.
But the lone-gunman theory is the most convenient plausible fall-back each time there has been a high-profile murder, whether it was JFK, RFK, MLK, President Ronald Reagan, the Pope, President Trump, or whoever. It was just a young white guy kook or some other convenient patsy. After Covid-19, who can really believe that?
As Survival Living and others are pointing out, in the past few years, with the rise of right-wing vloggers, we are ALL the voices for Charlie Kirk nowadays. We don’t have to dye our hair and dress like the opposite sex and buy an account on Bluesky to express ourselves. Independent citizen journalists such as James Li and Jake Tran are not waiting for their AAJA awards or Pen America Accolades or Pulitzer Prize or establishment credentials to publish. We don’t have to publish at AsAmNews or be selling vitamin pills every five minutes like Alex Jones. We have a duty to point out when there are concerted attacks by evil entities against Chinatown businesses and what color they are, because it can help the police identify which gang they belong to, since it tends to be black or brown in this area.
We will help the public and the FBI find out what happened to Charlie Kirk, why our rising right-wing media hope was downed. We will defend the right to debate and to express our opinions without fear, whether we disagree with whichever policy. We will do so without hate-mongering, weasel-words, or verbal threats. We will also protect the 1st Amendment and re-read the Declaration of Independence many times, to point out when or if this President is ruling like a tyrant or if a state of tyranny exists.
Op-ed and photo by AGN, photo of Independence Hall, site of the crafting of the “Declaration of Independence” in Philadelphia, PA