People’s Grand-Jury on COVID-19: Great Reset is here
The People’s Grand-Jury on COVID-19 was originally conceived based on ethics violations exemplified by the Nuremberg Trials against World War II Nazi criminal defendents, including the Doctors’ trial focusing on human experimentation and euthanasia murders. In fact, a team of lawyers, on behalf of the British population, filed a complaint this past January with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression, as reported by Dr. Mercola. In March 2021, the People of Truth, an Israeli-based organization led Anshei Emet, also filed a suit with the help A. Suchowolski & Co. Law Offices to the ICC for violations of the Nuremberg Code.
Both substantive reports allege violations of Nuremberg Code and as defined by Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute (a treaty adopted by the ICC in 1998) on international crimes. Involved are wrongs against humanity stemming from lack of informed consent, experimentation, genocide (article 6), crimes against humanity (article 7), war crimes (article 8), and other applicable violations of local precedents. A previous 46-page legal filing to the ICC was made on December 6, 2021 by a prosecuting team led by attorney Hanah Rose.
Anshei Emet claims that “many” were killed, injured and severely damaged by the COVID-19 vaccines, and that there are a disproportional number of people afflicted with side effects. A platform of live testimonies is viewable at the VaxTestimonies.org project. For Americans, C19VaxReactions.com is still available on the internet and @CovidVReactions on Twitter. (Note: TheCovidWorld.com, “because everyone’s story should be heard,” was taken down in late March, with only a few pages saved at Archive.org. Furthermore, DuckDuckGo is limiting COVID-19 news to mainstream outlets; therefore Startpage.com may turn out better search results.)
The authorities are deliberately stifling questions and dismissing concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and booster shots. Repression has spread against professionals trying to defend patients’ rights. More brutal retaliations are occurring with the help of law enforcement. This is why the British ICC filing includes a complaint on behalf of Dr. Andreas Noack of Germany who was presenting on the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ on YouTube on 26th November 2021, when he was arrested, attacked, and murdered. Another instance of armed overreach is on 22nd March 2022, anti-COVID-19 French trial attorney Virginie de Araujo-Recchia‘s home was invaded at dawn by hooded commandos who ransacked her family home, placed her in custody, and subjected her to interrogation. After three days she was released, but the detention has left her disgusted by the overt intimidation.
The prosecutors know that the 16 defendents named are some of the most powerful people in the world today. The accused include: Dr. Anthony Fauci, NIAID; Bill and Melinda Gates; Anthony Bourla, CEO of Pfizer; Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum; Boris Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister; CEOs of Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson; Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance; Rajiv Shah, Rockefeller Foundation; Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization; Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Advisor; June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products; Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care; Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary for Health and Social Care. For the case filed by People of Truth, the suit is against the Israeli government for allowing mass medical experimentation on the public.
Understanding the Orwellian realities in operation all over the globe, with medical and administrative governance being superceded by the World Health Organization pandemic regulatory framework, itself under the auspices of the World Health Assembly and United Nations, in turn heavily influenced by the World Bank, small wonder that the ICC may take forever to move these applications to trial.
The People’s Grand Jury therefore is taking a different approach. In the United States earlier this year, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wi) offered a five-hour hearing for a dedicated group of America’s frontline doctors and nurses who have collected evidence demonstrating their concerns about the effectiveness of the COVID-19 mandates. OneAmericaNetwork (and Alex Jones Infowars) was about the only network offering full coverage; Senator Johnson’s YT Channel offers a 38-minute clip, and a link to the full 5 hour panel, “COVID-19: A Second Opinion” uploaded to Rumble.com. With several million views, and thousands of comments, it’s easy to see that the public is interested in becoming informed.
Open hearings have the advantage of helping educate the public about the issues, especially when prime-time censors such discussions. Even so-called liberal NGOs YT channels are limiting presentations by anti-war grasstops to soundbites, such as two-minutes per person. Yet another gambit that succeeded in making headlines was David Georgiu’s petition to the Luxembourg Parliament to debate the topic of vaccinating children with COVID-19 vaccines. There are popular uploads on Odysee and Bitchute of the short-clip with Prof. and Dr. Christian Perronne. However that footage omits the fuller 1-1/2 hour debate, an upload by TheWashup on Rumble.com worth listening to in its entirety. Most importantly it gives the public a taste of the intractable mindset of the Parliamentarians from 12th January 2022, particularly as Dr. Anne-Marie Yim is repeatedly cut-off, and Dr. Benoit Ochs is misunderstood, while politicians repeatedly assert that WHO and CDC provide all the guidelines needed. All the tapes from the Luxembourg Parliament debate are not readily available, for instance, Dr. Luc Montagnier, along with Geneticist Alexandra Henrion Caude, also testified against compulsory vaccinations of children, according to sources. But the cross-questioning consistently views these doctors as representing those of dissidents who are outdated, forced into retirement, or even from a lunatic fringe.
Now it is useful to bear in mind that Luxembourg is one of the first countries in Europe to have legalized euthanasia since 2009. As Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition stated, Luxembourg should not follow in the path of Netherlands, where children with disabilities and people with chronic depression can be killed, even without consent.
“Whatever good intentions that may be related to the elimination of suffering, cannot justify the removal of the basic protection of a citizen to be free from lethal coercion, and the protection of life.”—LifeSiteNews.com
No wonder that the Corona Investigative Committee opted for the People’s Court of Public Opinion format. By turning the hearing into an open inquiry, it is the People who are the audience, participant, and judge. Now the experts can testify without strict limitations of expression, narrow time constraints or undue pressures from a hostile court. In fact, they can collectively develop the kind of cogent discussion that not only addresses many facets, explores the roots of the crisis, but stimulates the public to conduct further research.
Here is how Corona Investigative Committe (CIC) describes itself:
“Since mid-July 2020, the Corona Committee has been conducting live, multi-hour sessions to investigate why federal and state governments imposed unprecedented restrictions as part of the Coronavirus response and what the consequences have been and still are for the people.”
The CIC is an ongoing project, but the People’s Grand Jury hearing of February 2022 is officially concluded. Here is the description from the Grand-Jury.net:
“A group of international lawyers and a judge are conducting a criminal investigation modelled after the United States Grand Jury Proceedings in order to present to the public all available evidence of COVID-19 crimes against humanity to date against ‘leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices’ who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic. This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people, so YOU can be part of the jury.”
As many observers have noted, the COVID-19 crisis was planned long before the Event 201 Pandemic Preparedness Exercise. The fantasies of eugenics are connected to the bioweapons laboratories and rampant vaccine developments going back to the 2000s.
“Through showing a complete picture of what we are facing, including the geopolitical and historic backdrop — the proceeding is meant to create awareness about the factual collapse of the current, hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence; the necessity for the people themselves retaking their sovereignty; the necessity to first stop this plandemic’s measures by refusing to comply; the necessity to jump-start their own new system of health care, education, economics and judiciary — so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our constitutions will be reestablished.” — People’s Court of Public Opinion (Grand-Jury.net)
The compendium of research and intelligence is almost overwhelming; however, it is worth the listener’s time. The fact that the talks are not broken up allows one to grasp the overall context and especially the definitive questions, the cues, and the drift of the consensus as the evidence mounts. Having come from the school of The Last American Vagabond, listeners might believe that they are surrendering their own analysis of the arguments; on the contrary, the entire proceedings are reliant on vigilant citizen input and involvement. Ryan Cristian’s close-reading of the CDC documents for contradictions are just as invaluable as Dr. Bryan Ardis’s unschooled research into the fallacies of following rigid hospital protocols.
“Day 5 Financial Destruction” was especially invaluable for the layperson exploring the possible intersections of the plandemic/global reset/speculative finance/technocracy. Patrick Wood’s presentation on technocracy and transhumanism offers a historical insight into the aspirations of today’s eugenicists. The discussions from “Day 2” provide the geopolitical matrix which the intelligentsia have reserved for themselves. Presented by the medley of panelists each day, the erosion in public trust is less horrifying. In terms of how the coming digital currency and identification relates to the global push for a great reset, investment banker Leslie Manookian’s slide show is comprehensible even to laypersons. (It also correlates with how Professor Michael Hudson has warned that America is becoming a failed state.)
While indeed sobering, the proceedings offer hope and a sense of empowerment. Listening to these Europeans, one develops a deeper appreciation for the Old World; for instance, listening to Dr. Ariana Bilheran explore the world crisis from a philosophical and clinical perspective, or Meredith Miller discuss the ongoing societal transformation as it relates to cultural consciousness is almost cathartic. The People are now coming to terms with the knowledge that the global elite are desperate for a Great Reset because of an impending financial collapse due to looting of public funds and over-leveraging of the financial mechanisms. Whether the catastrophic recession takes place due to a plandemic or from the shortages brought on by world war is the tantalizing question.
In fact, since the end of February 2022, in the aftermath of the People’s Grand Jury, a world-war has indeed begun. It would be foolish to deny that the U.S. is not arming Ukraine to the teeth for a coming hot-war, possibly involving nuclear armaments. Congress had approved an initial $13.6 billion dollars worth of assistance for Ukraine, but that was not enough. Last week, the President requested an additional $33 billion to help shore up Ukraine’s defense capabilities until the end of September. However even that is not enough; according to RT.com, ideally the Ukraine President foresees assistance on the order of $2 billion per month. In latest reports, the war assistance includes weapons and training to neighboring NATO countries such as Poland, Germany, Bulgaria, and Georgia.
The greatest concern is that there is precious little talk taking place on peace negotiations. Even the travel of the United Nations Secretary General (UNSG) Antonio Guterres to Moscow, Russia on April 26, 2022 appeared to be for public relations and holding a symbolic press conference. Given that the United Nations is pretty much captured by the interests of NATO, the United States, and World Bank, UNSG talk about Russia appealing to the United Nations mechanisms for justice, such as filing complaints through the International Court hardly fools anyone. In fact, it was the United Nations which had ratcheted up sanctions (US), expelled Russian diplomats (US), and even voted to suspend Russia from the Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
However there are at least signs that negotiations are taking place to safely evacuate civilians from Mariupol. On May 2, 2022, the RT News indicated that Mariupol residents were trapped in a factory, essentially held there like hostages, by the Ukraine army. It’s not the first time that there are reports that the Ukraine army is using civilians as human shields.
“To that end I have proposed the establishment of a humanitarian contact group bringing together the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and United Nations to look for opportunities for the opening of safe corridors with local cessation of hostilities, and to guarantee that they are actually effective…My proposal is for a coordinated work of the United Nations, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Ukraine and Russian Federation forces to enable the safe evacuation of those civilians who want to leave, both inside the Azov Zone plan, and in the city in any direction they choose, and to deliver humanitarian aid required.” —U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres, April 26, 2022 in Moscow, Russia
If only one could guarantee that the President Zelensky would agree. Mysteriously enough, that same week, only a day before, there were secret meetings held between Zelensky, and top U.S. diplomats, Secretary of Defense Austin, and Secretary of State Blinken, to negotiate an additional $300mn in military financing and $165mn in non-US-made ammo for Soviet style weapons. According to the NYPost.com “the financing is for cashflow, bringing infusion total to $713m to be split among Ukraine and 15 allies and partner countries.” In any event, with such unwonted generosity by the White House for armaments, ready money, training, and new deployments for Ukraine, why would President Zelensky want the war to end?
Whether or not the Ukraine peace diplomats are suddenly executed on the suspicion of being spies; husbands and sons are drafted to the frontlines; a state of thuggery exists in which soldiers steal whatever they need at gunpoint; and people are prevented from evacuating if the green zone roads lead to Russia; denial of Russian humanitarian assistance is starving elderly Ukrainians in Donbass; meanwhile, President Zelensky is universally admired by the West, presumably for his capability to make vast amounts of money disappear quickly.
Perhaps the UNSG is oblivious to the gamification being played by President Zelensky with the U.S. officials just a day or so before he arrives in Kiev. Nevertheless if the United Nations is playing the peace emissary by flying humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan bringing to them banknotes worth $500mn, pushing the banks to unfreeze assets, and attempting to recognize the new Taliban government, it is a mere pittance compared with the vast sums spent by the U.S. over the past two decades. According to the Watson Institute, the costs of war in Afghanistan in billions FY2001-FY2022 is $2.3 trillion dollar total.
The worst part of the situation right now is that the media keeps insisting we are fighting for Ukraine, when in fact, we are fighting against Russia. The Russians were not in Afghanistan; they were indirectly involved in Syria; they are not heavily involved in Africa; but they are directly present right now on Ukraine soil. So arming and training Ukrainian regiments, whether in Germany or Poland, it is still essentially making war with Russia. No wonder the Russians are deadly serious about some kind of Great Reset for the West.